Decision rule

Results: 1359



#Item
401Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the

Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.in.gov

Language: English - Date: 2014-11-18 10:07:00
402Decision theory / Rulemaking / Law of agency / Law / United States administrative law / Administrative law

1. Rule-Making Agency:       2. Rule citation & name (name not required for repeal):       3. Action: ADOPTION[removed]AMENDMENT[removed]REPEAL

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.ncoah.com

Language: English - Date: 2014-11-07 15:27:18
403SUBMISSION FOR PERMANENT RULE

SUBMISSION FOR PERMANENT RULE

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.oah.state.nc.us

Language: English - Date: 2014-11-07 15:27:32
404Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the

Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.in.gov

Language: English - Date: 2014-11-20 10:02:55
    405Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the

    Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the

    Add to Reading List

    Source URL: www.in.gov

    Language: English - Date: 2014-11-19 10:07:28
    406Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the

    Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the

    Add to Reading List

    Source URL: www.in.gov

    Language: English - Date: 2014-11-21 08:33:22
    407Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the

    Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the

    Add to Reading List

    Source URL: www.in.gov

    Language: English - Date: 2014-11-18 09:50:00
    408Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or

    Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or

    Add to Reading List

    Source URL: www.in.gov

    Language: English - Date: 2014-11-19 10:33:16
    409United States administrative law / Antibiotic-resistant bacteria / Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus / Rulemaking / Consensus decision-making / Sociology / Social philosophy / Decision theory / Ethics / Administrative law

    12 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Regulatory Agenda[removed]Rule-Making Liaison:

    Add to Reading List

    Source URL: www.maine.gov

    Language: English - Date: 2014-11-18 10:42:39
    410[removed]WARGER V. SHAUERS DECISION BELOW: 721 F.3d 606 LOWER COURT CASE NUMBER: [removed]QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether Federal Rule of Evidence 606(b) permits a party moving for a new trial based

    [removed]WARGER V. SHAUERS DECISION BELOW: 721 F.3d 606 LOWER COURT CASE NUMBER: [removed]QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether Federal Rule of Evidence 606(b) permits a party moving for a new trial based

    Add to Reading List

    Source URL: www.supremecourt.gov

    - Date: 2014-03-03 17:13:52