401![Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the](https://www.pdfsearch.io/img/630a609c55538b05175235886503f770.jpg) | Add to Reading ListSource URL: www.in.govLanguage: English - Date: 2014-11-18 10:07:00
|
---|
402![Decision theory / Rulemaking / Law of agency / Law / United States administrative law / Administrative law Decision theory / Rulemaking / Law of agency / Law / United States administrative law / Administrative law](/pdf-icon.png) | Add to Reading ListSource URL: www.ncoah.comLanguage: English - Date: 2014-11-07 15:27:18
|
---|
403![SUBMISSION FOR PERMANENT RULE SUBMISSION FOR PERMANENT RULE](https://www.pdfsearch.io/img/1ab79034a40bf802ecd5960e18e7599f.jpg) | Add to Reading ListSource URL: www.oah.state.nc.usLanguage: English - Date: 2014-11-07 15:27:32
|
---|
404![Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the](https://www.pdfsearch.io/img/cfa6946ee1412f8869046839980609c0.jpg) | Add to Reading ListSource URL: www.in.govLanguage: English - Date: 2014-11-20 10:02:55
|
---|
405![Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the](https://www.pdfsearch.io/img/7a2eaa55d6c6eaa8b92b18954a5cf714.jpg) | Add to Reading ListSource URL: www.in.govLanguage: English - Date: 2014-11-19 10:07:28
|
---|
406![Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the](https://www.pdfsearch.io/img/e76b2c8028fbdfc03ea7be4f4d351f4c.jpg) | Add to Reading ListSource URL: www.in.govLanguage: English - Date: 2014-11-21 08:33:22
|
---|
407![Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the](https://www.pdfsearch.io/img/657a71b299b2ff4a1131d7f66a171057.jpg) | Add to Reading ListSource URL: www.in.govLanguage: English - Date: 2014-11-18 09:50:00
|
---|
408![Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or](https://www.pdfsearch.io/img/19701243450f700f2206aa711329b9bf.jpg) | Add to Reading ListSource URL: www.in.govLanguage: English - Date: 2014-11-19 10:33:16
|
---|
409![United States administrative law / Antibiotic-resistant bacteria / Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus / Rulemaking / Consensus decision-making / Sociology / Social philosophy / Decision theory / Ethics / Administrative law United States administrative law / Antibiotic-resistant bacteria / Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus / Rulemaking / Consensus decision-making / Sociology / Social philosophy / Decision theory / Ethics / Administrative law](/pdf-icon.png) | Add to Reading ListSource URL: www.maine.govLanguage: English - Date: 2014-11-18 10:42:39
|
---|
410![[removed]WARGER V. SHAUERS DECISION BELOW: 721 F.3d 606 LOWER COURT CASE NUMBER: [removed]QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether Federal Rule of Evidence 606(b) permits a party moving for a new trial based [removed]WARGER V. SHAUERS DECISION BELOW: 721 F.3d 606 LOWER COURT CASE NUMBER: [removed]QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether Federal Rule of Evidence 606(b) permits a party moving for a new trial based](https://www.pdfsearch.io/img/ca5dd0bf39b3d80ce33ed1300cf704df.jpg) | Add to Reading ListSource URL: www.supremecourt.gov- Date: 2014-03-03 17:13:52
|
---|